Re: [ml] SHA-1 craccato?

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:10:07PM +0100, Gengis Dave wrote:
* > > http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/20/1936257.shtml
* >
* > E' una notizia di due anni fa o sbaglio?
* > http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
* 
* Sembra piu' che altro che il governo americano abbia deciso (dopo due anni !!) 
* di eliminare l'algoritmo dai loro sistemi, ritenendolo non piu' sicuro.

Forse queste notizie vecchie di due anni si spiegano cosi':

===

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:03:45 -0500
From: Shu-jen Chang <shu-jen.chang@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: NIST announces Draft Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for 
         New Hash Algorithms

NIST Wants Comments on Proposed Hash Algorithm Requirements and
Evaluation Criteria

The National Institute of Standards and Technology is planning a
competition to develop one or more cryptographic hash algorithms to
augment and revise the current Secure Hash Standard (Federal
Information Processing Standard 180-2). As a first step in this
process, NIST is publishing draft minimum acceptability requirements,
submission requirements, and evaluation criteria for candidate
algorithms ( See the Federal Register Announcement on
http://www.nist.gov/hash-function ), and requests public comment by
April 27, 2007.

See also http://www.csrc.nist.gov/pki/HashWorkshop/index.html

===

questa è di ieri invece. Andrea

--
Andrea Pasquinucci                     cesare@xxxxxxx
PGP key: http://www.ucci.it/ucci_pub_key.asc
fingerprint = 569B 37F6 45A4 1A17 E06F  CCBB CB51 2983 6494 0DA2